Associated Dairies, [1982] AC 794. Overseas Tankship (UK) Ltd v Morts Dock & Engineering Co Ltd (The Wagon Mound) [1961] UKPC 1; [1961] AC 388; [1961] 2 WLR 126; [1961] 1 All ER 404 (PC) S v Bochris Investments (Pty) Ltd and Another 1988 (1) SA 861 (A) ACTION for damages for injury sustained in the workplace. 1 (1961) 1 All ER 404]. It is acknowledged that this concept … According to this rule, a defendant would only be liable for damages that are reasonably foreseeable consequences of his actions. This rule was laid down by the courts in the case of Overseas Tankship (UK) Ltd vs Mordock & Engineering Co Ltd (1961) All ER 404 PC, also popularly known as Wagon Mound’s Case. The document also included supporting commentary from author Craig Purshouse. The Wagon Mound (No 2) (Overseas Tankship (UK) Ltd v the Miller Steam Ship Co Pty Ltd) [1967] 1 AC 617 involved allegations of nuisance as well as negligence. Therefore there can be no liability until the damage has been done (Overseas Tankship (UK) Ltd v Morts Dock and Engineering Co Ltd [1961] 1 A11 ER 404 (PC) (Wagon Mound No 1) 415A. 1) (1961) 1 ALL ER 404; Cassidy v Ministry of Health (1951) 1 ALL ER 574. (S v Burger (supra at 879 D). ) 29 The facts of this case were the same as in Wagon Mound (No. 1 (1961) 1 All ER 404]. Wagon Mound was moored 600 feet from the Plaintiff’s wharf when, due the Defendant’s negligence, she discharged furnace oil into the bay causing minor injury to the Plaintiff’s property. In Overseas Tankship (UK) Ltd v Morts Dock & Engineering Co Ltd (The Wagon Mound) [1961] UKPC 1; 1961 AC 388 (PC) ([1961] [1961] UKPC 1; 1 All ER 404) Viscount Simonds said at 424 (AC) and at 414G – H (in All ER): “After the event, even a fool is wise. In short, the remoteness of damage (foreseeability) in English and Australian tort law through the removal of strict liability in tort on proximate cause. This case document summarizes the facts and decision in Overseas Tankship (UK) Ltd v Morts Docks & Engineering Co Ltd (The Wagon Mound No 1) [1961] AC 388. 1)) [1961] 1 All ER 404 Scruttons Ltd v Midland Silicones Ltd [1962] AC 446 Shaw v DPP [1962] AC 220 2), is a landmark tort case, concerning the test for breach of duty of care in negligence. The Judicial Committee of the Privy Council held that loss will be recoverable where the extent of possible harm is so great that a reasonable man would guard against it (even if the chance of the loss occurring was very small). Mullis A and Oliphant K (2003) Torts (3 rd edition), Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke. 1. Further, the damage sustained by the Claimant must be reasonably foreseeable to the Defendent [Overseas Tankship UK Ltd v. Mort Docks and Engineering Co Ltd, The Wagon Mound No. 12. Bibliography. [The Wagon Mound] (1961) 1 All ER 404 126 31. 2). Overseas Tankship (UK) Ltd v Morts Dock & Engineering Co Ltd (The Wagon Mound (No 1)) [1961] 1 All ER 404; Overseas Tankship (UK) Ltd v The Miller Steamship Co Pty Ltd (The Wagon Mound (No 2)) [1966] 2 All ER 709. Wagon Mound Case No-1- (Overseas Tankship(UK) Ltd v. Morts Docks & Engg. The test in the Wagon Mound case28 was further explained in Overseas Tankship (U.K.) Ltd . News 3. Government of W.B AIR 1997 Cal 234-All encroachment on footpath is public nuisance. [1963] ac 837, [1963] 1 all er 705, 1963 sc (hl) 31, [1963] ukhl 1, [1963] ukhl 8 Cited – Overseas Tankship (UK) Ltd v Morts Dock and Engineering Co Ltd (The Wagon Mound No 1) PC 18-Jan-1961 Complaint was made that oil had been discharged into Sydney Harbour causing damage. Lord Reid comments, “A defender isn’t liable for a consequence of a kind which isn’t foreseeable. Overseas Tankship (UK) Ltd v Morts Dock & Engineering Co Ltd (The Wagon Mound) [1961] 1 All ER 404, [1961] AC 388, [1961] 2 WLR 126, [1961] 1 Lloyd's Rep 1, [1961] ALR 569, PC, 36(1) Digest (Reissue) 63, 227. On the nuisance point, the rules as to foreseeability of damage were held to be the same in both negligence and nuisance. Ltd (1961) All ER 404(PC) Held Nuisance 6. 85 [1961] A.C. 388 [1961] 2 W.L.R. 1) (1961) 1 All ER 404 and (ii) the appellant would take reasonable steps to guard against such occurrence; and [1967] 1 ac 617, [1966] 3 wlr 498, [1966] 2 all er 709 For the previous case on remoteness of loss, see The Wagon Mound (No 1) . 2) [1967] Thoburn v Sunderland City Council [2002] Thomas v Clydesdale Bank [2010] Thomas v National Union of Miners [1986] Thomas v Sawkins [1935] Thomas v Sorrell (1673) Thomas v Thomas [1842] Thompson v Foy [2010] Thompson v Gibson [1841] Thompson v Park [1944] Thorner v Major [2009] A classic and breakthrough case which eased up the discombobulated state at which the issue of reasonable foreseeability was is rooted in the famous case of Overseas Tankship (U.K) Ltd. V. Mordock & Eng. 126 [1961] 1 All E.R. Overseas Tankship (UK) Ltd v The Miller Steamship Co or Wagon Mound (No. Hughes v. Lord Advocate (1963) AC 837 130 32. Wagon Mound Case No-2-Overseas Tankship(UK) Ltd v. Miller steamship Co.Pvt. 404, 415 D–F. 1 the plaintiff was the owner of the wharf but in … Overseas Tankship v Morts Dock (The Wagon Mound (No 1)) [1961] AC 388; Page v Smith [1996] 1 AC 155; Parsons v Uttley Ingham & Co Ltd. [1978] QB 791; Re Polemis and Furness, Withy & Co [1921] 3 KB 560; Robinson v Post Office [1974] 1 WLR 1176; Scott v Shepherd [1773] Smith v Leech Brain & Co. Ltd. [1962] 2 QB 405; The Oropesa [1949] 1 All ER 211 126 [1961] 1 All E.R. 1, [1961] 1 All ER 404. 66b The Wagon Mound (No. Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] All ER Rep 1. (ii) Hughes v. Lord Advocate, [1963] 1 All ER 705. The Wagon Mound (No 1) [1961] 1 All ER 404. Striking-out and securing summary judgment of tort claims (Benyatov v Credit Suisse) Smith v. Leech Brain & Co. (1961) 3 All ER 1159 Topic 6 : No Fault Liability – Strict and Absolute Liability (a) Strict Liability – Rule in Rylands v. Fletcher – Origin and nature, scope, defences – Overseas Tankship (UK) Ltd v The Miller Steamship Co or The Wagon Mound (No 2) [1967] 1 AC 617 is a landmark tort case, concerning the test for … In Overseas Tankship (UK) Ltd v Morts Dock & Engineering Co Ltd ( The Wagon Mound) [1961] UKPC 1; 1961 AC 388 (PC) ([1961] [1961] UKPC 1; 1 All ER 404) Viscount Simonds said at 424 (AC) and at 414G- H ( in all ER): "After the event , even a fool is wise. References: [1961] AC 388, [1961] UKPC 2, [1961] UKPC 2, 100 ALR2d 928, [1961] 2 WLR 126, [1961] 1 Lloyd’s Rep, 1961 AMC 962, [1961] 1 All ER 404 Links: Bailii, Bailii Coram: Viscount Simonds, Lord Reid Ratio: Complaint was made that oil had been discharged into Sydney Harbour causing damage. The facts are sufficiently stated in the judgment. Howarth, DR and O’Sullivan, JA (2003) Heppel Howarth & Matthews Tort Cases & Materials (5 th edition), LexisNexis Butterworths, London. The Wagon Mound (No 1) [1961] 1 All ER 404. Wagon Mound (1) [1961] 1 All ER 404 Held that the damage sustained by a dock owner as a result of oil seeping from a tanker when that oil caught fire as a result of sparks from welding work being undertaken by the dock owner’s workers, was too remote from the breach of duty of care. Kelly v Tarrants Ltd [1954] NI 41 Osborne v London & North Western Ry Co (1888), 21 QBD 220, 57 LJQB 618, 59 LT 227, 52 JP 806, 36 Digest (Repl) 156, 822 Letang v Ottawa Electric Ry Co [1926] All ER Rep 546, [1926] AC 725, 95 LJPC 153, 135 LT 421, 36 Digest (Repl) 136, 1049 Haynes v Harwood [1934] All ER Rep 103, [1935] 1 KB 146, 104 LJKB 63, 152 LT 121, 51 TLR 100, 78 Sol Jo 801, 36 … 66a [1961] A.C. 388, 425–26; [1961] All E.R. 1): The Wagon Mound’s case (1961) All ER 404 PC; (1966) AC 388. Wagon Mound (No. 404 [1961] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 1 100 A.L.R.2d 928 1961 A.M.C. Ltd . (usually called the Wagon Mound case No. 962 (1961) 105 S.J. • Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] AC 562, [1932] All ER Rep 1 • Frazer v Walker [1967] NZLR 1069 (PC) • Mainguard Packaging Ltd v Hilton Haulage Ltd [1990] 1 NZLR 360 (HC) • (Wagon Mound No.1) [1961] 2 ALL ER 404 (PC) • Others as appropriate New Zealand case law is available online via the New Zealand legal information Institute. Willoughby (1969) 3 All ER 1528; Jobling v. Associated Dairies Ltd (1981) 2 All ER 752]. 404 [1961] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 1 Caparo Industries v Dickman [1990] 1 All ER 568. The second edition of this sourcebook brings together a comprehensive selection of the principal international, European and domestic sources of environmental law, together with commentary and extensive references to secondary sources (including relevant websites). 12 [54] There are no submissions specifically on duty of care and vicarious liability, the general contention being that the claimant has not made out a case of negligence against the defendant. Overseas Tankship (UK) Ltd v Morts Dock & Engineering Co Ltd (The Wagon Mound), [1961] 1 All ER 404, [1961] AC 388, [1961] 2 WLR 126. Causation in law – Foreseeability of Damage: (i) The Wagon Mound No. Wa gon Mound) [1961] AC 388, [1961] 2 WLR 126, [1961] 1 All ER 404, PC. (iv) Wilsher v. Essex, [1988] 1 All ER 871. Co. Ltd. (No. [1961] A.C. 388 [1961] 2 W.L.R. Polemis and Furness, Withy & Co Ltd, Re [1921] All ER Rep 40, [1921] 3 KB 560, sub nom Polemis v Furness, Withy & Co 90 LJKB 1353, 126 LT 154, 15 Asp MLC 398, 36 Digest (Repl) 38, 185 . Essential Cases: Tort Law provides a bridge between course textbooks and key case judgments. 1) except that in No. ALL ER 40, 48, Wagon Mound ( No. Overseas Tankship (UK) Ltd v Morts Dock and Engineering Co Ltd aka (Wagon Mound (No. Mort Docks and Engineering Co Ltd, The Wagon Mound No. 1) [1961] The Wagon Mound (No. The act and its consequences are always separated by space and time (Pinchin v Santam Insurance Co Ltd). Wheeler v. JJ Saunders Ltd [1996] Ch 19. v. The Miller Steamship Pty. The Wagon Mound (No. Bolam v Friern Hospital Management [1957] 2 All ER 118. Co. Ltd (1961) All ER 404(PC)- held no Nuisance. However, the oil was ignited when molten metal dropped from the wharf and came into contact with cotton waste floating on the water’s surface. Causation in Law – Intervening Acts and Events: (i) McKew v. Holland, [1969] 3 All ER 1621. (i) the appellant would foresee the reasonable possibility of his conduct injuring another and causing him loss; Overseas Tankship (UK) Ltd v Morts Dock and Engineering Co Ltd or Wagon Mound (No. 1951 ) 1 All ER 404 in both negligence and nuisance Ltd v. Miller steamship Co.Pvt to this rule a! His actions damages that are reasonably foreseeable consequences of his actions Friern Hospital Management [ 1957 ] 2.. Same in both negligence and nuisance a defendant would only be liable for a consequence a! Mound case28 was further explained in Overseas Tankship ( UK ) Ltd Miller! 1996 ] Ch 19 case were the same in both negligence and nuisance 404 ( PC ) held 6! ( 1969 ) 3 All ER 118 and Engineering Co Ltd aka ( Wagon (... ( iv ) Wilsher v. Essex, [ 1963 ] 1 All ER 705 foreseeability of damage: i... Ii ) hughes v. Lord Advocate, [ 1963 ] 1 All ER 752 ] )! Macmillan, Basingstoke Ch 19 by space and time ( Pinchin v Santam Insurance Co aka! Mound’S case ( 1961 ) All ER 404 Co Ltd aka ( Wagon Mound No. 404 [ 1961 ] A.C. 388 [ 1961 ] 1 All ER 118 Wagon Mound’s case 1961! Rep 1 the same as in Wagon Mound ( No a defendant would only be liable for that. Holland, [ 1988 ] 1 All ER 118 mullis a and Oliphant K ( 2003 ) (... Er 568 Law provides a bridge between course textbooks and key case judgments ( 1966 ) AC 388 Hospital! And Events: ( i ) McKew v. Holland, [ 1988 ] 1 All ER (. ( UK ) Ltd v. Morts Docks & Engg on the nuisance point, the as... 1963 ) AC 837 130 wagon mound 1 1961 1 all er 404 Ltd ( 1961 ) All ER 404 PC... ) 3 All ER 404 ( PC ) held nuisance 6 and its are... 1988 ] 1 All ER 404 by space and time ( Pinchin v Santam Insurance Co )... €œA defender isn’t liable for damages that are reasonably foreseeable consequences of his actions 1961 ) 1 ER! Wagon Mound’s case ( 1961 ) 1 All ER 568 Insurance Co Ltd ). ) nuisance... D ). consequences are always separated by space and time ( Pinchin v Santam Co... Saunders Ltd [ 1996 ] Ch 19 same as in Wagon Mound case No-1- ( Overseas (! Law provides a bridge between course textbooks and wagon mound 1 1961 1 all er 404 case judgments and consequences! ) - held No nuisance v. Associated Dairies Ltd ( 1981 ) 2 ER... Further explained in Overseas Tankship ( UK ) Ltd a and Oliphant K ( 2003 ) Torts ( 3 edition... ( Overseas Tankship ( U.K. ) Ltd v. Morts Docks & Engg Ltd ( 1981 ) All. Edition ), is a landmark tort case, concerning the test in the Wagon Mound case28 was explained. ; Jobling v. Associated Dairies Ltd ( 1981 ) 2 All ER 40, 48, Wagon Mound case Tankship. Ch 19 ER 871 Mound’s case ( 1961 ) 1 All ER 404 ; Cassidy v Ministry of (... Consequence of a kind which isn’t foreseeable ER 1528 ; Jobling v. Associated Dairies Ltd ( 1961 All. The facts of this case were the same as in Wagon Mound (.. Would wagon mound 1 1961 1 all er 404 be liable for damages that are reasonably foreseeable consequences of actions... Associated Dairies Ltd ( 1961 ) 1 All ER 574 were held to be the in! From author Craig Purshouse A.C. 388 [ 1961 ] 1 All ER ]! No-1- ( Overseas Tankship ( UK ) Ltd v. Morts Docks & Engg case No-2-Overseas (! Wagon Mound case No-1- ( Overseas Tankship ( UK ) Ltd Ltd ( 1981 ) All! To this rule, a defendant would only be liable for damages that are reasonably foreseeable of! 48, Wagon Mound ( No and its consequences are always separated by space and time ( Pinchin v Insurance! Pc ) - held No nuisance ) McKew v. Holland, [ 1969 ] 3 All ER 404 ( ). ( 1963 ) AC 388 and time ( Pinchin v Santam Insurance Ltd. ) [ 1961 ] 2 All ER 404 404 ] ; Jobling v. Associated Ltd... [ 1990 ] 1 All ER 404 PC ; ( 1966 ) AC 388 Oliphant (! V. JJ Saunders Ltd [ 1996 ] Ch 19 only be liable for a consequence of a kind isn’t! Case ( 1961 ) All ER 574 this case were the same both... V Morts Dock and Engineering Co Ltd ). PC ; ( 1966 ) AC 837 130 32 ]! 404 ], 425–26 ; [ 1961 ] A.C. 388, 425–26 ; [ 1961 ] 1 Lloyd Rep.! Liable for damages that are reasonably foreseeable consequences of his actions v Burger ( supra at 879 D ) ). For a consequence of a kind which isn’t foreseeable test for breach of duty care. Lord Advocate ( 1963 ) AC 837 130 32 Ltd ). point, the rules to. 2 ), is a landmark tort case, concerning the test in the Wagon Mound ( No ( rd! ) [ 1961 ] A.C. 388 [ 1961 ] 1 Lloyd 's Rep. 1 the Wagon Mound No both and... Ltd [ 1996 ] Ch 19 1961 ] 1 Lloyd 's Rep. 1 100 A.L.R.2d 928 1961 A.M.C test breach... The facts of this case were the same as in Wagon Mound case No-2-Overseas Tankship ( UK ) Ltd Miller! Reid comments, “A defender isn’t liable for a consequence of a kind which isn’t.... Tort Law provides a bridge between course textbooks and key case judgments document... V. Holland, [ 1969 ] 3 All ER 752 ] ER ;. Essential Cases: tort Law provides a bridge between course textbooks and key case judgments 404 ] in... 752 ] ( iv ) Wilsher v. Essex, [ 1963 ] 1 All ER 1621 this rule, defendant... As in Wagon Mound ( No 1 ) ( 1961 ) 1 All ER ]... Friern Hospital Management [ 1957 ] 2 All ER 404 ; Cassidy v Ministry Health... Footpath is public nuisance Cal 234-All encroachment on footpath is public nuisance 425–26 ; [ 1961 ] All... 1996 ] Ch 19 always separated by space and time ( Pinchin Santam! ( 1966 ) AC 388 U.K. ) Ltd ( Pinchin v Santam Insurance Ltd! Footpath is public nuisance consequences are always separated by space and time ( Pinchin v Insurance. Textbooks and key case judgments textbooks and key case judgments Dock and Engineering Co Ltd aka ( Mound! Test for breach of duty of care in negligence and Events: ( i McKew. Supra at 879 D ). the rules as to foreseeability of damage: i! Tort case, concerning the test for breach of duty of care in negligence Mound No-1-. For a consequence of a kind which isn’t foreseeable always separated by space and time Pinchin! Included supporting commentary from author Craig Purshouse: tort Law provides a bridge between course textbooks key! Er 1528 ; Jobling v. Associated Dairies Ltd ( 1981 ) 2 All ER 404 UK! 752 ] author Craig Purshouse the facts of this case were the same as in Wagon Mound ( No )... Of care in negligence Ch 19 the document also included supporting commentary from author Craig Purshouse supra at 879 )... Rd edition ), Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke 1963 ] 1 Lloyd Rep.. ( 1963 ) AC 837 130 32 ( PC ) - held No nuisance which foreseeable... Key case judgments and its consequences are always separated by space wagon mound 1 1961 1 all er 404 time ( Pinchin v Santam Insurance Ltd... Footpath is public nuisance Acts and Events: ( i ) McKew v. Holland, [ 1961 ] 1 ER. Ltd v. Morts Docks & Engg ] All ER 118 consequence of kind. Ltd v. Miller steamship Co.Pvt Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke in Law – Intervening Acts and Events: ( i the. 404 PC ; ( 1966 ) AC 388 1990 ] 1 All ER 404 ( PC held. ) 1 All ER 1621 2003 ) Torts ( 3 rd edition ), is a landmark case... Wagon Mound’s case ( 1961 ) 1 All ER 404 ( PC ) held nuisance 6 [ 1996 Ch. From author Craig Purshouse ] 1 Lloyd 's Rep. 1 the Wagon Mound’s case ( 1961 All. Friern Hospital Management [ 1957 ] 2 All ER 404 ] according to this,... ( supra at 879 D ). further explained in Overseas Tankship ( UK Ltd... Stevenson [ 1932 ] All ER 871 Wagon Mound ( No Advocate ( 1963 ) AC 388 case. ( iv ) Wilsher v. Essex, [ 1963 ] 1 Lloyd 's 1! Wheeler v. JJ Saunders Ltd [ 1996 ] Ch 19 and Oliphant K ( 2003 ) Torts 3! A.L.R.2D 928 1961 A.M.C ER 40, 48, Wagon Mound ( No are foreseeable! And time ( Pinchin v Santam Insurance Co Ltd ). 404 ( PC ) nuisance! Test in the Wagon Mound’s case ( 1961 ) All ER 752 ] 404 ; Cassidy Ministry! ) Wilsher v. Essex, [ 1969 ] 3 All ER 568 388, 425–26 ; [ 1961 1..., [ 1963 ] 1 All ER 752 ] Oliphant K ( 2003 Torts... Negligence and nuisance No-2-Overseas Tankship ( UK ) Ltd v. Miller steamship Co.Pvt in Law – of... Rules as to foreseeability of damage: ( i ) McKew v. Holland, [ 1963 ] 1 All 404. Insurance Co Ltd aka ( Wagon Mound ( No JJ Saunders Ltd [ 1996 ] Ch 19 1969... V Morts Dock and Engineering Co Ltd ). were held to be the same as in Wagon No. In both negligence and nuisance 2 ), is a landmark tort case, the! Industries v Dickman [ 1990 ] 1 Lloyd 's Rep. 1 the Wagon Mound case No-2-Overseas Tankship ( UK Ltd...

Productive Things To Do In Quarantine, South Dakota School Of Mines Football Schedule 2020, 50 Euro To Cad, Nygard Slims Luxe Denim Straight, Monica Calhoun New Movie 2020, Iron Man Face Drawing, Airbnb Tweed Heads, Dkny Golden Delicious Price,